CJ's Page


A Response to Paul Butler's "Why Read That Book?"

Paul Butler is an African American man, a Harvard graduate. At one point he was a federal prosecutor, until he was arrested for a crime he didn’t commit. His time on the other side of the law helped him write his book Let’s Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, which provides his reader with an insider’s view into the world of justice and also introduces the concept of jury nullification as a powerful protest to unjust laws. Currently he serves as a professor of law at George Washington University.
Butler wrote “Why Read That Book?” to discuss the controversy over the word “nigger” and how many times it shows up in the novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. In his article, Butler writes that “it’s complicated, ‘nigger’ is” because of the way the word is treated in schools (Butler). Teachers pay special attention to the word and try to explain that it is not really the “nigger” that Twain spoke of. Instead, the teachers say that Twain “meant it ironically, or historically, or ironically” (Butler). He continues his argument, saying that this is not about censorship; it is about choice. Either choice, taking “nigger” out of the novel or leaving it in, will have unfortunate consequences. Butler’s argument is a strong one; the fact that either decision in censorship will be a choice with unfortunate consequences is very accurate. There is no happy medium between the two sides that will solve the problem.
More importantly, Butler stated that he “could live [his] whole life fine if [he] never read [Huck Finn] again” (Butler). This is a key testament to the fact that Huck Finn is not an “American Masterpiece.” Huck Finn, the protagonist of Twain’s novel, seems to grow in moral character throughout the novel. However, by the end of the novel, it is evident that Huck’s moral character has not really changed because Huck’s final assessment of Jim is, “I knowed he was white inside” (ch. 40). Huck can only compare Jim to a white man, someone who is racist throughout the whole novel. Some may argue that Huck is comparing Jim the “good white” stereotype, saying that Jim is just as good a person as a white man. However, Huck does not experience this stereotype in the novel and therefore has no way or reason to compare Jim to a white man. The stereotype of a white person that Huck sees throughout the novel is one where whites are superior, racist/discriminative, liars, and reckless people. As a result, this novel cannot be taken seriously as one in which the “hero” changes.
This novel does not show a change in society or Huck as evident by the fact that Jim, when Huck and Tom are making him be a “prisoner,” is already free. When Tom is asked why he went to so much trouble to free Jim, even though he was already free, he says, “Well that is a question I must say; and just like women! Why, I wanted the adventure of it” (ch. 42). Tom essentially admits to the fact that he, and Huck, used Jim as a doll, evoking the “Tom” stereotype from Jim. Tom and Huck refuse to let Jim free until they have had their fun with him as a “prisoner;” it is merely an adventure and game to them. Any change is society or Huck is not evident at the end of this novel.
Although this novel does not achieve it’s main purpose as a testimony against slavery, I do believe that it still should be read in schools, provided that it not be censored. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is a novel that teaches its reader about the harshness with which the “superior whites” treated the “inferior niggers.” The novel provides the viewer with the necessary cold hard facts from America’s history. One must learn from the past in order to avoid the same problems in the future. Therefore, this novel should be read in schools so that everyone can know about the past and make a change in the future. Twain, by the end of the novel, shows that there was still much to do in order to make the situation better. His novel is a comment on the southern society at the time in which it was written. He basically states that society has so much more to do in order to truly change what has happened.

Butler, Paul. "Why Read That Book?" Nytimes.com. The New York Times Co., 6 Jan. 2011. Web. 9 Jan. 2013. <http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/01/05/does-one-word-change-huckleberry-finn/why-bother-reading-huckleberry-finn>.

6 comments:

  1. I agree with your remarks that Huck Finn should be read in schools, but I disagree in that I believe Huck Finn to be an American masterpiece. The fact that Huck does not change morally throughout the novel adds to the beauty of its message: Huck Finn is a prime example of what was wrong with society at that tim, and I think Twain was writing it as a way to show people the absurdity of society's ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MICAELA, I agree with you. I think the reason why this is considered a good book is because he reflects America as a whole. It makes me like the book more to think about the fact that Twain is trying to point out the flaws of American society.

      Delete
    2. I disagree; it reflects southern society more than it does America as a whole. The book points out the flaws found in the southern American society. Twain's purpose was to inadvertently attack the southern society and their wrongs. He basically says that what they think is freedom and good is far from it. This is extremely evident in the Grangerford/Shepherdson feud. They think that they are good Christian people. However, that is not the case; they instead are the complete opposite. Bringing guns to Church, separating by family, shooting on sight of the other, etc., these are completely against the gospel/homily of "brotherly love" that they so cherish. In the end, Twain comments more on the southern, slave-owning American society than he does on the whole of American society.

      Delete
  2. I like your argument. However, here: "Tom and Huck refuse to let Jim free until they have had their fun with him as a “prisoner;” it is merely an adventure and game to them." It's not both of them that want to have "fun," only Tom. Huck just got dragged into Tom's game, and couldn't back out because of what he had told Tom already. But the argument is still strong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From the group,
    Although Huck was dragged into Tom's game, he soon became a part of it. He started to enjoy the "game" with Tom. One may argue that his only choice was to go along with Tom's game. However, that is not the case. He could have actually gone against Tom's wishes and ended the game, but he let society (Tom) trample over him. By going against Tom, Huck would effectively bring about change, both freeing Jim and releasing society's grasp on him. This would also make the novel better as Huck would now be a hero instead of the coward he is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Huck does make some increasingly vehement protests to Tom about the treatment of Jim. While Huck doesn't actually stop Tom's abuse, he does grow in protest - which seems to me to be a step in the right direction, especially considering that we are talking about a thirteen year old boy who has lived his entire life in the midst of Southern racism. I don't think that Huck completely changes at the end, but I also think that desiring that complete change would be unrealistic. Twain recognizes that Huck still has a long way to go with his growth, but I do think that Huck is still at least a bit better at the end. After all, he is so disgusted that he will travel out West to escape this horrible society - perhaps there he will get to continue his growth?

      Delete